Get the rest, free
Module 1 of the learning path, a 15 minute 1-1 call and community access. No card needed.
Join free300+ UK sellers
Accurate as of 07th August 2026
Amazon has changed how children’s toys are verified, and the change matters more to arbitrage sellers than to anyone else. You can no longer send safety documents to Amazon yourself. Every flagged toy must now be validated by an approved third-party laboratory, and that laboratory reports to Amazon directly.
This guide covers what Amazon’s policy actually says, which products it catches, what your listing has to show, what it costs, and the difference between what UK law requires and what Amazon requires. Some of what is being written about this policy is wrong, so where Amazon has not committed to something in writing, we say so.
What Has Actually Changed
Amazon has moved children’s toys onto a process it calls direct product validation. Under the old system, if Amazon asked you to prove a toy was safe, you uploaded the paperwork yourself and an Amazon reviewer looked at it. That route is closed.
Now, when one of your toy listings is flagged, you must work with a TIC provider from Amazon’s approved list. TIC stands for Testing, Inspection and Certification. It describes the type of organisation, not the name of the policy, which is worth knowing because plenty of people are using the acronym incorrectly. These are laboratories such as SGS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas, TÜV and Eurofins.
The provider either tests your product or validates existing testing documents you already hold, and then they submit the result to Amazon on your behalf. You never upload anything again.
You can still use a laboratory that is not on Amazon’s list, but an approved TIC provider has to validate their results afterwards. In practice that means paying twice.
Amazon also states that products may be subject to periodic testing or additional evaluation at any time as part of its ongoing quality control and surveillance. If further testing is required, you are notified in Account health.
The programme started in the US in early September 2025 and has since been extended across Amazon’s European stores. It now covers the UK alongside Canada, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Poland, the Netherlands and Belgium.
Where To Find It In Seller Central
Account Health, then Policy compliance, then Food and product safety issues. It is not filed under toys, and it is not filed under listing issues, which is why a lot of sellers have notices sitting unread. Notices also arrive by email, and that email is easy to miss.
What Amazon Counts As A Children’s Toy
The definition is far broader than most people assume, and this is where sellers get caught out.
Amazon’s UK policy defines a children’s toy as a product intended for use in learning or playing by a child under 14 years of age (168 months). A product is treated as a children’s toy if any of the following apply:
- The age rating on the packaging states the product is intended for use by a child under 14
- The product is represented in its packaging, display, promotion or advertising as appropriate for use by a child under 14
- The product is commonly recognised by consumers as being intended for use by a child under 14
- The product has play value for a child under 14, including factors such as fun, education, creativity or imagination
That fourth criterion is the one to pay attention to. Amazon states explicitly that a product with play value or appeal to children may be subject to this policy even if it is not specifically designed as a toy, and that design, intended use, characteristics and labelling alone may not exempt a product from the requirements.
In plain terms: “it isn’t really a toy” is a much weaker argument than sellers assume.
Worth noting that some Amazon enforcement notices phrase the threshold as “14 years or younger” while the UK policy page says “under 14 years of age (168 months)”. If your product sits anywhere near that line, assume it is in scope.
The Eight Categories Amazon Lists
Amazon publishes a broad list of children’s toy categories. It states this list is not exhaustive, so treat it as a guide to the shape of the policy rather than a definitive boundary.
| Category | What It Covers |
|---|---|
| Sensory and creative play | Toys engaging the senses and encouraging creativity through texture, colour and hands-on activity. Sensory toys, fidget spinners, slime |
| Games and educational toys | Products aimed at cognitive development, problem-solving and critical thinking. Puzzles, science kits, learning toys |
| Pretend and role play | Toys supporting imaginative play by mimicking real-life roles and scenarios. Costumes, pretend play sets |
| Infant, toddler and soft toys | Everything marketed for infants and toddlers, plus all soft toys |
| Vehicles and remote-control toys | All vehicle toys and anything operated by remote control. RC toys, ride-on toys |
| Action figures, dolls and collectibles | Character figures, themed sets, dolls and doll houses, memorabilia. Explicitly includes items that also appeal to adult collectors |
| Outdoor and active play | Products encouraging physical activity and coordination. Projectile toys, outdoor play equipment |
| Electric toys | Anything electrically powered to create movement, sound, light or interactive effects. Electric ride-on cars and scooters, interactive playsets |
Note that collectibles are explicitly in scope, even where the buyer is an adult. If you have been assuming your collectible figures sit outside this policy because your customers are grown-ups, they do not.
Amazon runs separate but similar programmes for children’s jewellery and children’s sand products, so adjacent categories are covered too.
Toys You Cannot Sell At All
Separately from the testing requirement, Amazon prohibits certain toys outright. No amount of testing makes these listable. Its examples include, but are not limited to:
- Abrasive kite strings
- Beaded and amber teething jewellery
- Powerful magnets
- Throwing star fidget spinners
- Toothpick crossbows
If you are sourcing anything in this territory, stop before you buy rather than after. A prohibited product is not a compliance problem you can solve, it is stock you cannot sell on Amazon at any price.
The Standards Your Toy Has To Meet
Amazon requires all children’s toys to have been tested against and comply with the following:
| Product | Standards |
|---|---|
| Children’s toys | BS EN 71 (Safety of Toys) |
| Electric children’s toys | BS EN 71 (Safety of Toys) and BS EN 62115 (Electric Toys. Safety) |
If you are validating documents you already hold rather than paying for fresh testing, the test report must come from an ISO 17025-accredited laboratory and demonstrate compliance with the standards above. A supplier invoice, a retail receipt or a generic certificate will not do it. This is the specific reason most arbitrage sellers cannot use the cheap document-validation route: the document they need is one they were never given.
Note that electric toys need both standards, which is a large part of why testing costs jump so sharply once batteries or electronics are involved.
What Your Listing Itself Has To Show
This part gets overlooked. Passing the test is not the whole requirement. Amazon also specifies what the product detail page and the images have to contain, and a listing can fail on these alone.
Listing Attributes
- Model, part or item number
- Manufacturer or brand name
- The mandatory cautionary statement
- Either Minimum manufacturer age recommended (months) or Manufacturer minimum age (months)
The trap: the lowest age rating shown on your detail page must be greater than or equal to the age rating on the test report. If the product was tested for 36 months and up, your listing cannot say 24 months. Sellers who inherit a detail page built by somebody else are especially exposed here, because you may not have written the age attribute yourself but you are still answerable for it.
Images
Your images need to evidence:
- Model, part or item number
- Name and address of the manufacturer, importer, private labeller, distributor or authorised representative
- Product labels
- Compliance markings
- Product instructions and manuals
- The CE or UKCA mark
- For Northern Ireland, the CE mark, plus UKNI marking if a UK-notified body carried out a mandatory third-party conformity assessment
Practically, that means photographing the packaging properly, including the small print and the marking, rather than relying on the brand’s stock photography. If you cannot produce an image of a compliance marking because the marking is not there, that is a signal worth taking seriously before you send the stock in.
Why This Hits Arbitrage Sellers Hardest
Here is the single most expensive misunderstanding about this policy, and it is worth reading twice.
Compliance attaches to you, not to the listing. Amazon’s policy states plainly that each selling partner is responsible for their own product compliance and must submit their own request.
If the brand owner has already cleared that ASIN, it does not cover you. Every seller on a flagged listing receives their own notice and is expected to answer it independently. Sellers do occasionally see a request clear without any action on their part, which we come back to below, but the policy position is that you cannot rely on inheriting somebody else’s clearance.
For a private label seller this is an annoyance and a cost. For an arbitrage seller it is a structural problem, because you did not manufacture the product, you have no relationship with the brand, and the document at the centre of the whole process — an ISO 17025 test report — is one you were never issued.
Your Four Options If You Bought It From A Shop
Say you bought 30 LEGO sets from Argos on clearance, listed them, and Amazon has now flagged the ASIN. Here is the realistic picture, and we would rather be straight with you than sell you optimism.
1. Get The Manufacturer’s Test Report Validated
This is the cheapest compliant route by a distance. A TIC provider validates an existing BS EN 71 test report from an ISO 17025-accredited laboratory rather than testing from scratch, at a fraction of the cost.
The obstacle is obtaining the document. Brands issue these to their authorised distribution chain, and an unauthorised reseller who bought at retail usually has no route to ask. It is worth one email to the brand. Do not count on a reply.
Verdict: try this first, but do not expect much.
2. Pay For Full Laboratory Testing Yourself
Technically open to anyone. You send a sample, the laboratory tests it against BS EN 71, plus BS EN 62115 if it is electric, and the result goes to Amazon.
But consider what you are actually doing: commissioning safety testing on a product you did not make, in order to sell perhaps 30 units of it, with the sample destroyed in the process. On typical arbitrage margins the testing cost alone can exceed the entire profit on the buy.
Verdict: rarely viable at arbitrage volumes.
3. Appeal That The Requirement Does Not Apply
This is a narrower route than most sellers hope, and Amazon’s policy wording is the reason why. Because a product can be captured on play value alone, and because Amazon says design, intended use, characteristics and labelling may not exempt it, the argument “this isn’t really a children’s toy” often fails.
Adult-targeted collectibles are the clearest example. Sellers assume these sit outside the policy. Amazon’s own category list includes collectibles and memorabilia, so that appeal is likely to go nowhere.
A genuine misclassification does happen — something swept in by a category error, or a product with no play value at all — and appealing is free. But if the product plainly has play value for a child, an appeal only spends time you do not have.
If you do appeal, there is a specific line about CE and UKCA marking worth putting in your comments. We have set it out further down, under A Line Worth Putting In Your Appeal Comments.
Verdict: only where it has been genuinely misclassified, and that bar is higher than it looks.
4. Stop Selling It And Move The Stock Elsewhere
Unglamorous, and for most arbitrage sellers holding a small quantity of a flagged toy, the rational answer. eBay, Vinted, a car boot sale or a local marketplace will clear it. Take the lower margin, and put your capital into a category that does not carry this overhead.
Verdict: usually the correct call.
The honest summary: if your model is buying branded toys at retail and reselling them, this policy makes toys a category to be wary of. Not impossible, but the compliance cost does not scale down to 20-unit buys. Sellers with brand relationships and deeper stock can absorb it. Most arbitrage sellers cannot.
How To Submit A Test Request
You can only start this after Amazon sends you a document request. There is no way to pre-clear a product or a catalogue.
- Find the request in Account Health. Under Policy compliance, click Food and product safety issues, find the product, and click Submit in the Next steps column. Note the Address issue by date. That is your real deadline, and it is set per ASIN rather than being one date for everybody.
- Choose Verify your product. You can verify a single product, or click Select more products to batch everything caught by the same policy requirement into one submission. If the option to submit is missing entirely, use the appeal route and Amazon will assign the ASIN to the correct workflow.
- Get quotes before you commit. You can request quotes from several providers and compare price, turnaround and service. Prices and timelines vary considerably between laboratories, and you are under no obligation to take the first one. Filter by provider country to find one that is practical to ship a sample to.
- Create the TRF and send the ID to your laboratory. Select your provider, confirm your contact details, and Amazon generates a Test Request Form, or TRF, with an ID. Send that ID to the laboratory. Everything after this point happens directly between you and them, outside Amazon.
- Get the status to “in progress” before your deadline. This is the step that protects you. Once the laboratory receives your sample or documents, they mark the TRF as in progress, and while it sits in that state your ASINs are not enforced. A TRF that has been created but not actioned protects nothing.
- The laboratory reports to Amazon, not to you. When testing finishes, the provider sends the result straight to Amazon. If it passes, there is nothing further to do. If it fails, the listing is deactivated immediately and stays down until compliant documents reach Amazon.
One request covers multiple stores. If the same ASIN is flagged in several Amazon stores under the same policy requirement, a single TRF covers all of them and the results apply everywhere once complete. A toy flagged in both France and Italy needs one submission, not two. Do not pay twice for this.
How To Appeal
Go to Account Health, then Policy compliance, then Food and product safety issues. Click Submit on the product, select Appeal request, choose a reason from the drop-down, and add comments explaining why you believe the product has been incorrectly identified or why the requirement does not apply. Amazon reviews it and follows up by email if it needs more information.
A Line Worth Putting In Your Appeal Comments
Check the packaging first. Before you write anything, physically confirm that the CE or UKCA mark is on the packaging. Never claim a marking that is not there.
If it is present, this is worth including in the comments box:
“The packaging features the CE and UKCA marks [delete as appropriate]. Under European and British toy safety law, printing these marks is a legal declaration by the manufacturer that the item complies with all relevant safety requirements, including BS EN 71 parts 1, 2, and 3.”
The point it makes is a fair one. A conformity marking is not decoration. Affixing a CE or UKCA mark is the manufacturer’s formal declaration that the product meets the applicable toy safety legislation, backed by a technical file and a Declaration of Conformity they are legally obliged to hold. Saying so reframes your appeal from “please make an exception for me” into “the conformity assessment has already been carried out, by the party whose job it is to carry it out.”
Two things to understand before you lean on it. Strictly speaking the mark declares conformity with the essential safety requirements of the legislation rather than with BS EN 71 specifically. BS EN 71 is the designated standard that gives presumption of conformity and it is the normal route, but a manufacturer is permitted to demonstrate conformity by other means. The wording above is fine for an appeal, but know the distinction if Amazon comes back on it.
Second, this is an argument rather than a guarantee. Amazon’s requirement sits above the legal baseline, so it can still insist on TIC validation whatever the packaging says. Make the point, but do not stop working on your TRF while you wait for an answer.
If Your Request Disappears On Its Own
Something sellers have noticed: compliance requests sometimes move to archived without the seller having done anything at all. The likely explanation is that another seller on the same ASIN completed validation, or Amazon withdrew the notice, and the outcome was applied at listing level rather than to each seller individually.
Treat that as good luck, not a strategy. Amazon’s written policy is unambiguous that each selling partner is responsible for their own compliance and should submit their own request to protect their account. Waiting to see whether somebody else solves your problem is a reliable way to arrive at your deadline with nothing submitted. But if a notice vanishes from your dashboard with no explanation, that is probably why.
What It Costs
Amazon does not set the price. The laboratories do, and they quote individually. There is no official rate card, and we are not going to pretend there is.
The figures below are indicative ranges reported by TIC providers and compliance consultancies through 2025 and 2026, converted roughly and rounded. Treat them as a sense of scale, not a quote.
| Type Of Work | Indicative Cost |
|---|---|
| Document validation only Where you already hold an ISO 17025 test report |
Around £70–£250 per product |
| Simple toy tested from scratch BS EN 71. Plush, moulded plastic and similar |
Roughly £250–£450 |
| Electric toys BS EN 71 plus BS EN 62115 |
£500 upwards, four figures is common |
Add the cost of the sample itself, which is consumed by destructive testing, and shipping it to the laboratory. Turnaround is commonly quoted at around 30 days from the laboratory receiving your sample, so a deadline four weeks out is tighter than it looks.
Run those numbers against a typical arbitrage buy and the problem is obvious. On 30 units at £4 profit each you are looking at £120 of margin against a testing bill that starts higher than that. Our FBA profit calculator will show you the per-unit picture, though you rarely need it to see that this does not clear.
Is This The Law, Or Is It Amazon?
Both, but not in the same way, and the distinction matters more than most coverage of this suggests.
Toy safety in the UK is governed by the Toys (Safety) Regulations 2011, which sit behind the BS EN 71 series of designated standards covering mechanical and physical properties, flammability and chemical limits. Toys placed on the UK market need to carry a UKCA or CE mark and be backed by a Declaration of Conformity.
Those regulations assign duties according to your position in the supply chain:
- A manufacturer must carry out conformity assessment and hold the technical file
- An importer must check the manufacturer has done so before placing goods on the market
- A distributor, which is what you are if you buy finished, already-compliant goods from a UK retailer, has a duty to act with due care: check the marking and safety information are present, and do not supply anything you know or should suspect is non-compliant
What UK law does not do is require a distributor to commission their own laboratory testing. That part is Amazon’s policy, and it goes beyond the legal baseline. Amazon is entitled to set stricter conditions for selling on its platform, and it has done exactly that.
The practical upshot: if you import toys directly from outside the UK you are an importer with real legal obligations and you should take proper advice. If you buy from a UK high street retailer you are a distributor, you are very likely already operating lawfully, and your problem is purely a platform one.
This is general information, not legal advice. If you are importing toys or facing enforcement action, speak to a compliance professional or your local Trading Standards service.
What To Do This Week
Whether or not you have had a notice yet.
- Check Account Health today. Look under Policy compliance, then Food and product safety issues
- List every toy ASIN you hold stock in. Use Amazon’s eight categories as your checklist, and include collectibles, soft toys and anything electric. You want to know your exposure before Amazon tells you, not after
- Check your age attributes now. Make sure the minimum age on each detail page is not lower than the age the product was tested for. This one is fixable in minutes and is a needless way to fail
- If you have a notice, act on it immediately. Your protection comes from getting the TRF to “in progress”, and that requires the laboratory to have received something from you. Working back from a 30-day turnaround, waiting a fortnight is fatal
- Close or delete toy listings you do not intend to defend. Amazon explicitly asks you to do this, and leaving flagged listings open that you will never clear only adds to the account health picture
- Reprice toy stock you are holding and move it. If you cannot comply, the value of that inventory only goes down from here
- Factor this into your Q4 sourcing. Toys are a Q4 staple for arbitrage sellers, and going in without a plan for this is how people end up with capital locked in stock they cannot sell
Frequently Asked Questions
Does This Apply To Every Toy I Sell, Or Only Flagged Ones?
Only when Amazon sends you a document request. You cannot submit a test request before you have been notified, and there is no way to pre-clear a catalogue. Amazon says products may be subject to periodic testing or additional evaluation at any time as part of its ongoing quality control and surveillance.
Do I Have To Re-Test Every Year?
Amazon’s published policy does not state a fixed annual cycle. What it says is that products may be subject to periodic testing or additional evaluation at any time. Some compliance consultancies describe the requirement as annual and some sellers report yearly cycles, but we have not seen Amazon commit to that in writing, so we are not going to state it as fact. Budget for repeat costs, but do not assume a fixed renewal date.
The Brand Owner Has Already Had The Product Tested. Am I Covered?
No. Amazon’s policy states that each selling partner is responsible for their own compliance and must submit their own request. Every seller on a flagged listing answers for themselves. This is the single most expensive misunderstanding around this policy.
My Compliance Request Disappeared On Its Own. What Happened?
Sellers have reported requests moving to archived without taking any action, most likely because another seller on the same ASIN completed validation, or because Amazon withdrew the notice. It is not something to count on. Amazon’s policy says each selling partner is responsible for their own compliance, so the safe assumption is always that you have to answer your own notice. Treat an unexplained disappearance as good luck rather than a plan.
The Product Has A CE Or UKCA Mark. Is That Not Enough?
Not on its own, as far as Amazon is concerned. The marking is the manufacturer’s legal declaration that the product meets the applicable toy safety legislation, and it is well worth citing in an appeal. But Amazon’s requirement sits above the legal baseline: it wants validation submitted by an approved TIC provider regardless. Make the argument, and keep working on your TRF at the same time.
My Product Is Aimed At Adult Collectors. Am I Exempt?
Almost certainly not. Amazon’s own category list includes action figures, dolls and collectibles, and specifically describes them as appealing to collectors as well as children. A product can also be captured on play value alone, and Amazon states that design, intended use, characteristics and labelling may not exempt it. Adult framing is a weak appeal.
What Counts As An Acceptable Test Report?
A report from an ISO 17025-accredited laboratory demonstrating compliance with BS EN 71, plus BS EN 62115 for electric toys. Retail receipts, supplier invoices and generic certificates do not qualify. If you cannot obtain a report meeting that description, the cheap validation route is closed to you.
Can I Use My Own Laboratory Instead Of One On Amazon’s List?
You can use any accredited laboratory, but if it is not on Amazon’s authorised list, one of Amazon’s approved TIC providers still has to validate the results before they reach Amazon. You end up paying for two services rather than one, so there is usually no saving unless you already hold reports from that laboratory.
What Happens While Testing Is Underway?
Once your provider marks the TRF as in progress, your ASINs will not be enforced while it stays in that state. That protection depends on the laboratory actually having received your sample or documents. Simply creating the TRF does not pause anything.
What If The Product Fails?
The listing is deactivated immediately and stays down until compliant documents are submitted. There is no grace period on a failure. If you disagree with the result, Amazon’s position is that you raise it with the TIC provider directly, since Amazon makes its determination from what the laboratory reports.
I Sell The Same Toy In The UK And Germany. Do I Need Two Submissions?
One. If the same ASIN is affected by the same policy requirement across multiple stores, a single TRF covers all of them, and the results apply everywhere once complete. Submitting duplicates just costs you money.
Does This Affect Bundles And Multipacks?
Yes, and you should raise it with your provider early. Amazon specifically flags component parts and bundles sold as one unit, identical items in a multipack, and variations such as different colours, sizes or flavours as cases to agree an approach on with the laboratory before testing starts.
Is It Still Worth Sourcing Toys For Q4?
If you have brand relationships or buy from distributors who supply documentation, yes. The compliance overhead is real but manageable, and less competition is not a bad thing. If you are buying branded toys at retail clearance in small quantities, be careful. The risk is not that you get into trouble, it is that capital gets locked into stock you cannot list. There are categories with none of this overhead.
Conclusion: Know Your Exposure Before Amazon Tells You
This policy is not going away, and it is expanding. Amazon updates its approved provider list monthly, and coverage has widened steadily through 2026 across the European stores.
The scope is also wider than the word “toy” suggests. Play value alone can pull a product in, collectibles are explicitly included, and the detail page and images carry requirements of their own on top of the testing. If you sell anything a child under 14 would enjoy, you are closer to this policy than you probably think.
For arbitrage sellers the practical takeaway is not panic, it is arithmetic. Work out how much of your capital is sitting in toys, accept that a flagged ASIN you cannot document is stock you will be moving off Amazon, and price that risk in before your Q4 buying rather than after it.
If you are not sure whether your stock is exposed, bring it to the community. We have members working through these notices right now, and it is considerably faster to ask people who have already submitted a TRF than to work it out from a help page. Join fulfilledby free and ask.